By Nate Raymond and David Brunnstrom
Devyani Khobragade, who was deputy consul-general in New York, was
arrested on December 12 and indicted on Thursday by a grand jury for
visa fraud and making false statements about how much she paid her
housekeeper.
Her arrest set
off protests in India amid disclosures that she was handcuffed and
strip-searched. The dispute soured the broader U.S.-India bilateral
relationship, leading to sanctions against American diplomats in New
Delhi and the postponement of visits to India by senior U.S. officials
and another by a U.S. business delegation.
A United Nations diplomat familiar with the case said Khobragade had
flown out of the United States. In India, the foreign ministry said she
was being transferred to a post in New Delhi.
Khobragade's lawyer Daniel Arshack said she would leave with her head "held high."
"She knows she has done no wrong and she looks forward to assuring that the truth is known," he said in a statement.
While both New Delhi and Washington stressed the importance of their
bilateral relationship during the crisis, it has taken weeks of complex
wrangling to find a workable solution both sides could live with.Documents and statements from U.S. officials reveal a dizzying 24 hours in which the State Department granted Khobragade diplomatic immunity, unsuccessfully asked India to waive that immunity and ordered her to leave the country immediately.
According to documents provided by Arshack, the U.S. mission sent a letter to Khobragade on Wednesday granting her diplomatic status as of 5.47 p.m. (2147 GMT) that day.
On Thursday, the Indian mission to the United Nations rejected the State Department's request that her immunity be waived. Then in a diplomatic note, the U.S. mission requested Khobragade's immediate departure from the United States and said it would take steps to prevent her from obtaining a visa in the future. It also said Khobragade, 39, who is married to an American, risked arrest if she tried to return.
"Upon her departure a warrant may be issued for her arrest and should she seek to enter the United States she could be arrested," the note said.
There was no immediate comment from the Indian Embassy in Washington or its mission to the United Nations.
The foreign ministry statement in New Delhi said: "At the time of her
departure for India, Counsellor Khobragade reiterated her innocence on
charges filed against her.
"She also affirmed her determination to ensure that the episode would
not leave a lasting impact on her family, in particular, her children,
who are still in the United States."
India was incensed by the treatment of Khobragade and has curtailed
privileges offered to U.S. diplomats in New Delhi. On Wednesday it
ordered the U.S. Embassy to close a club for expatriate Americans there.
Also on Wednesday, U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz postponed a visit
to India scheduled for next week. This move came days after U.S.
Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Nisha Desai Biswal delayed
her first visit to the country to avoid the trip becoming embroiled in
the dispute.
The arresting
authority, the U.S. Marshals Service, characterized the strip search as a
routine procedure imposed on any new arrestee.
As well as this treatment of Khobragade, India was angered that the
United States took it upon itself to fly the nanny's family out of
India. The prosecuting attorney, Preet Bharara of Manhattan, an ethnic
Indian, said attempts were made in India to "silence" the nanny,
Sangeeta Richard, and compel her to return home.
Safe Horizon, a non-government organisation that campaigns for victims
of abuse, said that although Richard's legal presence in the United
States was tied to her employment, she had been granted temporary
permission to remain while she cooperates with law enforcement as a
victim of human trafficking.
It said Richard was likely to apply
for a special "T-1" visa reserved for trafficking victims. Such a visa
would be valid for up to four years and allow her to work in the United
States. It can also lead to lawful permanent residence, according to the
website of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
UNDERLYING PROBLEMS
Khobragade's departure would remove the focus of current friction
between New Delhi and Washington, but it is unclear how long it will
take the anger to subside in the run-up to national elections in India
in May. Also, the continued presence of Richard in the United States
could prove an irritant.
The
case has exposed underlying problems in a bilateral relationship that
has failed to live up to its billing by President Barack Obama in 2010
as "a defining partnership for the 21st Century."
Critics accuse Obama of failing to pay sufficient attention to ties
with a country viewed as a key strategic counterbalance to China and as
an engine to boost the U.S. economy, while American hopes of building a
more robust business relationship with India have run into bureaucratic
hurdles.
Indian sourcing
rules for retail, information technology, medicine and clean energy
products are contentious and U.S. firms complain about "unfair" imports
from India of everything from shrimp to steel pipes. In June, more than
170 U.S. lawmakers signed a letter to Obama about Indian policies they
said threatened U.S. jobs.
Speaking at a seminar on Thursday, Ron Somers, president of the
U.S.-India Business Council blamed "bumbling on both sides" for the
Khobragade affair.
"We have to do some thinking on this side as
to what has there been in the way of frustration that allowed this
incident to provoke and spill over as it has," he said."We really need now to be building trust and taking an introspective look at whether we really mean what we say when we talk about strategic partnership and how do we get there."
(Reporting by Nate Raymond, Joseph Ax and Chris Francescani in New
York, David Brunnstrom in Washington, Louis Charbonneau at the United
Nations and Frank Jack Daniel in New Delhi; Editing by Clive McKeef,
Eric Walsh and Raju Gopalakrishnan)
<yahoo>
No comments:
Post a Comment