Mallam Nuhu Ribadu
The
All Progressives Congress, the Campaign for Democracy, the Human
Rights Agenda Network and a former Chairman of the Economic and
Financial Crimes Commission, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, on Tuesday told
President Goodluck Jonathan to see the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal’s criticism of his administration’s
anti-graft war as a wake-up call.
They said the criticism should not be
dismissed with a wave of the hand because it came from the speaker,
who is not only a Peoples Democratic Party member like Jonathan, but
the nation’s number four citizen.
Tambuwal had at an event organised by
the Nigerian Bar Association to mark the 2013 International
Anti-Corruption Day in Abuja on Monday , said the President’s body
language did not show he had the political will to stem graft in the
country.
The APC, in a statement by its Interim
National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, commended Tambuwal ,
saying by speaking out on the way the Jonathan government was handling
the anti-graft war, he had displayed patriotism and dedication to the
nation.
It described the Jonathan administration’s fight against corruption as tepid.
The party said the speaker exhibited a
rare leadership trait by shunning partisanship to speak out against
the poor manner the Jonathan government was handling glaring corruption
cases.
The APC said, “Tambuwal and President
Jonathan belong to the same political party(Peoples Democratic Party),
but this did not deter the speaker from rising above crass
partisanship when the issue involved borders on national interest.
“This is the stuff of good leadership.
Tambuwal has shown that he is indeed the Speaker of the House of
Representatives and that the entire country is his constituency.”
It noted that corruption had eaten deeper into the national fabric since Jonathan came to power.
The party added ‘’We have raised the
same issues raised by the Speaker several times in our regular
intervention, but the administration has dismissed our concerns on the
altar of partisanship.
“However, now that no less a personality
than the country’s number four citizen and a top member of the PDP is
the one raising the issue, and coming against the background of
Nigeria’s slide in the 2013 rankings released recently by the global
anti-corruption body Transparency International, we hope the
administration will realise that it has only been paying a lip service
to the anti-graft battle, and perhaps make amends.”
It said the speaker was totally right in talking about the President’s body language.
According to the APC, this is a reflection of the deceptive actions he (President Jonathan) has taken on serious issues.
The serious corruption cases, it
stated, included the fuel subsidy scam, the pension scam, the fraud
involving the excess crude account and Oduahgate .
The APC added, ‘’These are slam dunk
corruption cases that should have been handed over to the
anti-corruption agencies for summary disposal. Instead, the President –
thinking Nigerians will merely scream and forget after some time
engages in his usual distracting method of setting up committees, the
report of which he will then put away to gather dust until another
corruption case rears its ugly head.”
The party said that Nigerians were not
stupid, adding that they understood that President was shielding corrupt
people as long as they were willing and able to contribute funds to
his (President’s) campaign slush funds.”
The HRAN, a coalition of over 200 human
rights organisations and activists, accused the Jonathan
administration of lacking the commitment to fight corruption.
In a statement it released to mark the
2013 International Human Rights Day, HRAN pointed to the failure of
the government to act on reported scam cases in the Nigerian National
Petroleum Corporation and the SURE-P programme as clear indications
that
Jonathan was not serious about anti-corruption campaign.
The statement, which was signed by the
Chair, Steering Committee of the group, Mr. Chino Obiagwu, added that
corruption and abuse of office were the main causes of human rights
abuses.
“HRAN is concerned that many cases of
corruption in the last two years have not been properly dealt with,
clearly indicating that the Jonathan administration is not committed to
the fight against corruption,” the statement added.
Also, Ribadu advised Jonathan to accept Tambuwal’s advice in good faith.
Ribadu said ,”My own and what I will
want to add is to talk to President Jonathan directly and say please
listen: when people talk, especially serious people, people, who are in
strategic positions in our country, when they tell you something take it
and improve yourself.
“The message of the speaker is that of
Mr. President, wake up, what you have been doing is not going well
especially with the fight against corruption. And all that he (speaker)
said are nothing new.
“They are all that we as Nigerians are
aware of and we see it and we live with it daily. I want to appeal to
the President that as our leader, the President of 160million Nigerians,
Nigerians are telling him the reality and the truth, especially when it
comes to the fight against corruption, let him listen to speaker Aminu
Tambuwal.
“What he said is the truth. What he said
is what Nigerians believe. What he said is the fundamental thing that
today all of us are worried and concerned. . It is not to come out say
they are going to fight or they are going to be defensive. It is a
matter of telling you for you to correct yourself.”
But the Coalition Against Corrupt
Leaders and Afenifere argued that corruption in the country
should not only to the attributed to the Executive, but to the
Legislative arm of government.
CACOL , in a statement said, “Mr.
Speaker should realise that the National Assembly is a part of the
whole. It is fair to remind Tambuwal that his allegation has left no arm
of the present government vindicated of corrupt practices.
“Had it been the House had played its
oversight functions – as stipulated by constitution – it would not have
been that easy for corruption to fester in the country.
“The Speaker lacks the moral ground to
either accuse Jonathan of corruption or shift the blame on any other
person, because he is also guilty as he had alleged.”
No comments:
Post a Comment